Latest topics
» Latest lottery result
by Carole Today at 10:41 am

» Winner of January 2012 Calendar photo competition ...
by RitaG Today at 7:23 am

» Gosh, it's just about Autumn!
by roseman Yesterday at 6:42 am

» Weather = rain
by Balinbear 21st February 2012, 10:13 pm

» Dumbfounded!!!???!!!
by RitaG 20th February 2012, 6:45 am

» February, 2012 entry submission now open
by RitaG 20th February 2012, 6:41 am

» Vote for your favourite January, 2012 Photo Calendar Entry here ...
by RitaG 20th February 2012, 6:39 am

» Who's got This One.
by Margaret 19th February 2012, 5:57 pm

» Tipsy Imperial Concubine
by Ozeboy 15th February 2012, 6:40 am

» A few photo questions
by AutumnDamask 14th February 2012, 9:34 pm

» !!!! YES !!!!
by Simon 14th February 2012, 6:48 pm

» My place
by AutumnDamask 10th February 2012, 2:06 pm


ID of some Roses.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

ID of some Roses.

Post by Tinpot on 18th December 2011, 3:09 pm

Hi,
Hoping you might be able to help me with some rose ID's.
Please excuse the state they are in, we have had unusual humidity and more rain this than in the last ten years.

The following ones came from an old station homestead, and am curious to know what they are








This yellow one seems to have a pink blush when fully open and had a sucker come up that looked like a climbing red rose.




Ta in advance if you can help.

Cheers
Kim

Tinpot

Number of posts: 12
Location: Vic
Registration date: 2011-12-11

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Tinpot on 18th December 2011, 3:10 pm

Embarassed Didn't change one to portrait , sorry.

Kim

Tinpot

Number of posts: 12
Location: Vic
Registration date: 2011-12-11

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by roseman on 18th December 2011, 4:36 pm

Kim, your Red climber on your yellow rose is rootstock and it's name is 'Dr Huey'. I think you will have to dig down and find where it is coming from and cut off as clean as possible.

roseman

Number of posts: 1504
Age: 58
Location: Mudgee, NSW
Registration date: 2009-01-11

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Tinpot on 18th December 2011, 4:55 pm

Ta for that, I'm digging them all up when we move so I'll cut it back then.

Cheers

Tinpot

Number of posts: 12
Location: Vic
Registration date: 2011-12-11

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Barbara B on 18th December 2011, 5:59 pm

Hi,
the first one looks like Rosendorf Sparrieshoop. Number five looks like Cousin Essie.
Barbara B

Barbara B

Number of posts: 219
Location: Somerville, Victoria, Australia
Registration date: 2009-05-14

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Simon on 18th December 2011, 6:39 pm

Number two looks like the Tea 'Comtesse de Labarthe' (aka 'Duchess de Brabant')

Simon

Number of posts: 3763
Age: 41
Location: Kindred, Tasmania
Registration date: 2008-02-08

http://www.rosetalkaustralia.com

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by OzRose on 18th December 2011, 6:48 pm

Hi Kim.
#1 looks like it may be Sparrieshoop to me
#3 could be Queen Elizabeth
#4 may possibly be Sea Foam
#5 Wedding Day perhaps ?

Have you joined Help Me Find [also known as HMF] Kim ?
http://www.helpmefind.com/gardening/index.php?tab=1
It's an invaluable resource and you can cross match the names that have been suggested to you with the roses on their data base to see if they match with your roses at home.


Good Luck on your Quest.

cheers. Rosalie

OzRose

Number of posts: 362
Age: 50
Location: In the hills. S.W of Western Australia
Registration date: 2010-03-13

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by AutumnDamask on 18th December 2011, 9:11 pm

Don't know if the flowers on #5 are big enough to be 'Wedding Day' ? Would have to see the stems and thorns... and back of leaves.
'Honey Flow' has smaller flowers like that (?) but mine is a small bush so can't comment on how it is supposed to be as an established plant.

AutumnDamask

Number of posts: 396
Location: Benalla, Victoria
Registration date: 2011-06-08

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Simon on 18th December 2011, 9:56 pm

The ID on this one:



... is going to be difficult because it looks like a multiflora or hybrid multiflora rose, however, a little more information might help us narrow it down. Firstly, does it only flower once or does it repeat bloom throughout the season? Can you tell us anything about it, like where it came from? There is a good chance it is an old understock whose top grafted section has died off leaving behind the multiflora stock. Does it have prickles? If so, where? Many of the multiflora plants used as understocks were thornless, or nearly so but nearly all have small prickles under the leaf (called the rachis). Could you take some diagnostic-type photos of things like the leaves (old and new), the flowers, the buds, if you have a macro setting on your camera the anthers in the middle of the flower, prickles, the base of the leaves, etc. Does it smell sweet and a little 'fruity' and does it form lots of small red/orange hips in Autumn? This will improve the chances of a positive ID... or at least narrow down the field. It's going to be a long shot on this one, however, given its similarity to lots of others roses.

Cheers,

Simon


Last edited by Simon on 19th December 2011, 4:56 pm; edited 1 time in total

Simon

Number of posts: 3763
Age: 41
Location: Kindred, Tasmania
Registration date: 2008-02-08

http://www.rosetalkaustralia.com

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Guest on 19th December 2011, 8:59 am

No. 1 is not ‘Rosendorf Sparrieshoop’, 1988. That has more petals than the foundling.
It may be ‘Sparrieshoop’ 1953 which is a small climber and has flowers of about 4 inches wide.

No. 2 Might be ‘Comtesse de Labarthe’

No. 3 is ‘Queen Elizabeth’

No. 4 Don’t know

No. 5 is not ‘Cousin Essie’ which has more petals than the foundling.
No. 5 is not ‘Honey Flow’ which has a pale pink edge to the petals
No. 5 is not ‘Wedding Day’, Stern, 1950. See Margaret’s photo on HelpMeFind for the distinguishing mucronate-tipped petals of this rose.
No. 5 may be R. multiflora ‘Nana’. (The nana means small). Jim Delahanty’s photo, on HelpMeFind is the closest to what it should look like. The bush grows to half a metre, and the individual bloom (not meaning the cluster here) is only about an inch wide. See http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.40647

No. 6 (the yellow) Don’t know.


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Simon on 19th December 2011, 4:58 pm

Should also add, as additions to the information requested about No. 5, what is its habit like? Does it climb or ramble and if so to what height if allowed?

Simon

Number of posts: 3763
Age: 41
Location: Kindred, Tasmania
Registration date: 2008-02-08

http://www.rosetalkaustralia.com

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Margaret on 20th December 2011, 9:01 am

I have the impression that multiflora seeds readily, and the seedlings are in two groups; small repeat-flowerers, and spring-flowering climbers. People used to sell packets of "fairy rose" seed (sounds like a con to me), and the seedlings were mostly small-flowered single white or pink shades.
There are some large-flowered climbers around, but maybe they're the ones that gardeners are more likely to keep.
A lot of my "foundlings" have turned out to be understocks.


Last edited by Margaret on 20th December 2011, 10:22 pm; edited 1 time in total

Margaret

Number of posts: 82
Location: SA
Registration date: 2011-10-12

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Tinpot on 20th December 2011, 1:39 pm

Thank you for the ID's.
I'll have a go with that help me find as well.
I have copied the questions and will take some more photos.
Thanks
Kim

Tinpot

Number of posts: 12
Location: Vic
Registration date: 2011-12-11

Back to top Go down

Re: ID of some Roses.

Post by Lauriek on 23rd January 2012, 2:43 pm

No. 3 = Queen Elizabeth

Lauriek

Number of posts: 18
Location: Hawthorn East
Registration date: 2010-06-06

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum